Skip to main content

The British Labour Party, Palestine and Antisemitism



The biggest cheers of the whole speech given by Jeremy Corbyn to the Labour Party Conference in September were generally reckoned to go to his plea for an end to the oppression of the Palestinian people.

There is indeed much to applaud in this. Labour has traditionally been a party of the oppressed and the Palestinian people are widely acknowledged, including in several UN Resolutions, to have legitimate demands for restitution, focused particularly on the annexation of land by Israel following the 1967 war. 

For many in the Labour Party Palestinians are, however, seen as uniquely oppressed. 

Moreover, support for Palestine allows some in Labour to turn a blind eye to antisemitism.

Worse, support for Palestinians for some Labour members moves over into being actively antisemitic.

So why are some in the Labour Party so concerned with Palestinian rights compared to many other oppressed people across the globe; why is antagonism towards Israel as a state so much stronger than towards other states that have truly awful records in terms of using force against their own people and other countries and why does all of this lead to a worryingly prevalent strain of antisemitism in the party?

The answers seem to be assembled from several building blocks:

- Britain in its Imperial past was heavily involved in paving the way for a Jewish state in Palestine, the Balfour Declaration being the starting point. 

- Israel is regarded as a product of colonialism and settlement and hence its very foundation was oppressive towards the indigenous population

- For some the Jewish people in this context are regarded as 'white' in obvious contrast to the Palestinians

- The principled stance of anti-racism is then engaged in a binary manner so that Israel is judged to be engaged in white oppression

- Israelis are then characterised only as oppressors

- For some this opposition to the oppression of the Israeli state moves over to viewing not just Israel, not just Israelis but the Jewish people as a whole as oppressors. The fact that Israel is far richer and far more powerful than the oppressed is tied in to longstanding antisemitic tropes about 'the Jew' as privileged and powerful.

So tragically the very principles of anti-racism, anti-colonialism and support for human rights have become warped to the point that for some in the Labour party the actions of the State of Israel particularly human rights abuses are used as an explanation for criticisms which are just anti-semitic. 

Opposition to oppression has ended up demonising the entire Jewish people - who have of course themselves been oppressed for centuries and subjected to systematic genocide. 

This includes many Jewish people who are themselves strong critics of the actions of the Israeli state.

The effect within the Labour Party is increasingly severe. Group think -  part and parcel of increasing factionalism - is emerging (or perhaps in some case re-emerging) in some local Labour party branches which is highly and aggressively antagonistic towards any criticism of this explicit or implicit anti-semitism. 

More sadly still this antagonism is couched in terms of protecting free speech; but the intention is anything but free speech. In fact it is about denying the validity of criticism and, particularly when accompanied by a strong 'no platforming' stance, is a way of closing down discussion. 

This failure to respond to anti-semitism seems to be metastasising within the Labour party. Allowing it to become a peculiarly revolting aspect of virtue signalling to a factional in-group is a catastrophe.









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Best (and Worst) Films of 2023

  One of the most joyful rediscoveries this year was Percy Adlon's  Bagdad Cafe  which in a wonderfully surreal manner captures the magic, literal and figurative, that a most unlikely outsider brings to the moribund, allowing them to realise what they have been missing through their obsessive introspection and to grow through the recognition of the value in difference. Could there possibly be a message in there? In the 'they do still make'em like that' category the outstanding example was the  The Three Musketeers: D'Artagnan  which was pure pleasure from the tip of its épée to the handle of its poignard, running full tilt with the ridiculousness of the plot half way round France and back across the Channel without pausing for breath. Hats are worn with an angle of jaunt worthy of an Expressionist noir, swords are barely ever in a scabbard, panelling is chewed liberally and Eva Green's use of her belle poitrine auditions it for separate billing in the cast list.
Post a Comment
Read more

There are worse things than cows on the line

A new explanation for the delay to my train this afternoon: cows on the line. This did, however, provide some time to reflect on other rather more serious characteristics of modern life than the inconvenience occasioned by the peregrinations of the odd Friesan.  So here are six which seem to me to be particularly pernicious aspects of our current situation.  1.  Libertarianism : otherwise known as letting me do whatever I want and a plague on everyone else. Such a convenient doctrine for the already powerful and utterly malign as a philosophy for the common good with a resolution to remove everything that might be a constraint or require a contribution to the commonweal. This is wholly distinct from liberalism and indeed individualism which are both important and positive. The basic issues that libertarianism always avoid are that a free for all never serves those without agency. The deep structural imbalances in society that fuel inequality have to be collectively addressed
4 comments
Read more

Museum Hours

A new blog which fittingly has a first post about the  film  which provided the inspiration; a quite wonderful, wry look at a few days in the life of a museum attendant in Vienna. There have presumably been easier pitches in the history of cinema but we should be deeply grateful that this gently subversive piece made it through. For this is a film that shouts quietly. About the way that we all too easily jump to conclusions about people based on what they look like and what they do; indeed how in a gallery we ignore or look down on the watchers without reflecting that they may be rather more acute in their observation of us. Our attendant relatively early lets slip that he spent much of his former life on the road with rock groups and in one particularly droll moment slightly hesitantly announces to an amused Mary Margaret O'Hara that he does still like heavy metal whilst looking as though he would be considerably more likely to put on a CD of Mantovani. About the way that w
3 comments
Read more