Skip to main content

Saved By The Vole: My Evening As A Troll



'Don't drink and dial' is the sage advice given to one character in the film Sideways meaning that ringing your ex wife after two bottles of Pinot Noir (and certainly not Merlot) is probably not a good idea.

A more contemporary version would be along the lines 'don't text after midnight'.

So how by 11pm last night, after two modest glasses of Singha beer, a very good Thai Green Curry and having been out to see a gloriously humane Finnish film called The Happiest Day In The Life Of Olli Maki, am I writing the most horrific things about a person I've never met and with whom I simply have a major difference of political opinion?

It all started so innocently by coming to the aid of a friend who was being assailed on Facebook and was looking for some support. Some initial posts seemed to do an effective job of contesting some of the more ludicrous things that were being said. 

Then there started to be a longer exchange that became increasingly focused as a dialogue between myself and one other person. Danger sign number one: its becoming personal.

That dialogue started with an admittedly robust but genuine exchange of views focused on the issues. However, there was in practice no common ground at all. Black is white. Good is bad. Truth is lies. Danger sign number two: there's no basis for having this exchange because not only are we not on the same page, we're not even reading the same book and I rather doubt we're even speaking the same language.

Then we start accusing each other of being delusional. I think he has no concept of the real world outside his bubble; he thinks the same of me. Now once we've started down this alley there really is no turning back because (danger sign number three) we now not only are we not even trying to persuade each other, we are saying that even the opinion of the other person is invalid. 

Naturally, then we start making ad hominem comments. Not swearing or direct abuse but casting clear doubt on the integrity, intelligence and maturity of the other. I'm doing my de haut en bas bit suggesting none too subtly that he's barely out of swaddling clothes and needs a sedative. He's telling me that I'm a tory hating loser who only feels at home on the Guardian comment page. Danger sign number four, well it doesn't really need saying does it?

The only reason that I haven't succumbed to writing direct abuse by this stage is that I don't want to give him the sense that he might have got under my skin. I just want to treat him with disdain and contempt.

In private I'm seeing red; I've completely lost it in the way that normally only happens watching LFC screw up against some crap side. So alongside these  public exchanges are some furious WhatsApp messages to other people on the Facebook thread which are completely unhinged. 

I'm saying that I would commit physical violence on this person if we were face to face. I'm saying revolting things, treating him as sub-human and someone who should be left to rot in a ditch. 

In short in the space of a few hours I have come to the point where I am that angry that I am actually feeling that I would happily see this person come to a bad end.

It takes the intervention of saner and frankly much better human beings than myself to stop this spiralling further. They start sending me pictures of animals and finally its the vole that does it. You can't look at a vole and feel anything but unbounded affection. 

Its an unsettling experience. It is so easy to see how hate speech and trolling is so rife on social media. There are two trite conclusions from all of this.

First, the effect of the face to face. If I had been having this exchange in person I suspect that it would indeed have ended up in a shouting match but at least we would have seen each other and been able to gauge from body language whether we were really all that keen to pursue what was clearly about as far as it is possible to be from a meeting of minds.

Secondly, political dialogue is now so poisoned that there are different tribes each with their own talking points and intent solely on talking past each other. Because we start by not admitting any merit in the opposite point of view we rapidly end up just shouting. Doing this sitting in rooms distant from each other only magnifies the effect.

The best comment on all of that is probably best summed up in another photo that was sent to me last night ...








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best (and Worst) Films of 2023

  One of the most joyful rediscoveries this year was Percy Adlon's  Bagdad Cafe  which in a wonderfully surreal manner captures the magic, literal and figurative, that a most unlikely outsider brings to the moribund, allowing them to realise what they have been missing through their obsessive introspection and to grow through the recognition of the value in difference. Could there possibly be a message in there? In the 'they do still make'em like that' category the outstanding example was the  The Three Musketeers: D'Artagnan  which was pure pleasure from the tip of its épée to the handle of its poignard, running full tilt with the ridiculousness of the plot half way round France and back across the Channel without pausing for breath. Hats are worn with an angle of jaunt worthy of an Expressionist noir, swords are barely ever in a scabbard, panelling is chewed liberally and Eva Green's use of her belle poitrine auditions it for separate billing in the cast list.

There are worse things than cows on the line

A new explanation for the delay to my train this afternoon: cows on the line. This did, however, provide some time to reflect on other rather more serious characteristics of modern life than the inconvenience occasioned by the peregrinations of the odd Friesan.  So here are six which seem to me to be particularly pernicious aspects of our current situation.  1.  Libertarianism : otherwise known as letting me do whatever I want and a plague on everyone else. Such a convenient doctrine for the already powerful and utterly malign as a philosophy for the common good with a resolution to remove everything that might be a constraint or require a contribution to the commonweal. This is wholly distinct from liberalism and indeed individualism which are both important and positive. The basic issues that libertarianism always avoid are that a free for all never serves those without agency. The deep structural imbalances in society that fuel inequality have to be collectively addressed

Museum Hours

A new blog which fittingly has a first post about the  film  which provided the inspiration; a quite wonderful, wry look at a few days in the life of a museum attendant in Vienna. There have presumably been easier pitches in the history of cinema but we should be deeply grateful that this gently subversive piece made it through. For this is a film that shouts quietly. About the way that we all too easily jump to conclusions about people based on what they look like and what they do; indeed how in a gallery we ignore or look down on the watchers without reflecting that they may be rather more acute in their observation of us. Our attendant relatively early lets slip that he spent much of his former life on the road with rock groups and in one particularly droll moment slightly hesitantly announces to an amused Mary Margaret O'Hara that he does still like heavy metal whilst looking as though he would be considerably more likely to put on a CD of Mantovani. About the way that w